The Fat Tax: Is it the Answer to Our Obesity Epidemic?

Fat-tax-is-it-the-answer-to-our-obesity-epidemic
Amelia Phillips

Posted by

Share this article

Hands up if you like tax! I didn’t think so. Hands up if you like nanny state reforms? Me neither. So it’s no surprise that people are up in arms about the possibility of a fat tax. But let’s get one thing straight, we are fast facing a ‘globesity’ epidemic. If we don’t start a culture shift soon, our kids and their kids will be the ones who will live shorter, less healthy lives.

The question remains though, is a ‘fat tax’ the right way to go about reducing our ever expanding waist lines?

Denmark lead the way in the world’s first fat tax

Recently, Denmark became the first country in the world to introduce a tax on foods that contain more than 2.3% fat. To put that into shopping speak, that’s butter, milk, cheese, pizza, meat, oil and processed foods.

The aim is to reduce people’s intake of fatty foods, but it’s not to curb obesity. Fewer than 10% of the Danish population are obese, which is quite a bit lower than the 15% European average. The outgoing conservative government in Denmark planned the fat tax as part of a goal to increase the life expectancy of the Danes. Danish research shows that excessive consumption of saturated fats causes about 4% of the nation’s premature deaths with the current average life expectancy of 79 years expected to drop by three years over the next 10 years.

How will the new fat tax affect the cost of food in Denmark?

The new tax will add 16 kroner (around $AUD3.00) per kilo of saturated fats in a product, increasing the price of a burger by around $AUD0.15 and raising the price of a small package of butter by around $AUD0.40. As a result, the Danes began stockpiling tax affected products, filling their freezers in the lead up to this new tax.

Where it all began

Health minister Jakob Axel Nielsen introduced the idea of a fat tax back in 2009, stating that, “Higher fees on sugar, fat and tobacco is an important step on the way toward a higher average life expectancy In Denmark” because “saturated fats can cause cardiovascular disease and cancer.” In March this year the tax was approved by large majority of the parliament.

Will Australia bring in a fat tax?

Chief executive Kate Carnell from the Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) says a similar tax would not address our obesity levels. Australia has had a 10% Goods and Services Tax (GST) on processed foods since 2000, yet obesity levels have continued to rise. Taxing dairy products has also been ruled out as the AFGC is encouraging people to have more calcium in their diets rather than less.

In a bid to curb obesity in Australia, the AFGC is calling on involvement from industries, governments and communities to help solve the crisis. One in four Australians are overweight or obese, which is why leading industry bodies, manufacturers and governments are all putting plans in place to help overcome the issue.

Here’s what’s currently being done:

  • Leading manufacturers have reduced the saturated fat content of cooked and smoked sausages and luncheon meats (excluding salami) to less than 6.5 grams of saturated fat per 100 grams.
  • The Victorian government recently spent $40 million on educating the public about nutrition and the importance of exercise.
  • CHOICE announced it will start naming and shaming foods making misleading health claims.
  • Australia has reportedly joined with the United States and Canada to call for the United Nations to change their rules around regulating the production and marketing of unhealthy foods.
  • The Cancer Council is calling for cartoons used in junk food advertising to be banned.
  • The Australian Medical Association wants to ban the advertising of junk food to children.
  • Hungry Jack’s recently announced that vegetable options will now accompany its burgers.

Is a Fat Tax the Answer?

No I don’t think it necessarily is going to affect our obesity levels by simply taxing high fat foods. I can only imagine that the increased costs to manufacturers would simply be passed onto consumers. I do, however think that on a cultural level, there needs to be a multi-faceted approach to treating obesity, and this could be one such angle.

In the last 50 years we have managed to halve the number of Australians smoking by taking a multifaceted approach. According to Biggest Loser Trainer Michelle Bridges, we need to be tackling our obesity epidemic in a similar way as we did the Tobacco industry. Maybe introducing a fat tax alone won’t help, but could it be the beginning of this cultural shift?

Do you think that introducing a fat tax would impact our obesity levels?

Read SMH News Review opinion here.

Tags: , , , ,

  • http://ruthe12wbt.wordpress.com Ruth.E

    Fat tax will not lower food intake quantity or encourage exercise. Lets make fresh, healthy food cheaper! Lets stop cooking shows that glorify high fat saturated foods and deep frying! Lets have cooking shows that prove healthy can also be interesting, delicious and tasty. Lets make exercise more enjoyable rather than ‘make’ kids do it at school. Definitely need another “Be in it” campaign, loved that.

  • Pingback: Your Questions About Obesity Epidemic Facts | Healthy Silicone Valley

  • http://www.health-and-weight-loss-tips.com Tony Rovere

    A fat tax will not affect eating habits. Governments have failed to legislate morality and they will have to regulate the eating habits here.

    However, I do understand why this is starting the world over. When you see the staggering costs of health care for those who are diagnosed with the so-called ‘diseases of affluence’, some cancers, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, this is the reason for the ‘Fat Tax’.

    As an example, in 2006 in the US over $500,000,000,000 was spent on cardiovascular disease alone! That was more than the GDP in Sweden that year.

    So while this may fail, it is a reaction to the costs of obesity.

  • Danny

    As a competing triathlete I take very good care of myself. It is my right to this lifestyle just as much as it is for someone to let themselves go. I do on the other hand get very annoyed when my health insurance premium goes up and my tax dollars go into a health system black hole. My idea is simply to proved a tax break to those that can hit a range of health indicators. This changes the whole argument around to ‘incentive’ instead of ‘tax’ and ‘want to’ instead of ‘have too’. I also think that we should start taking lifestyle classes (including cooking) more seriously in our schools. If you are taught from a young age what is the right way to do something then it will stay with you for life.